Should politicians retirement funds be invested in pharmaceuticals?

"IAHF.COMWith both State and Federal government employee retirement plans hopelessly entangled in pharmaceutical investments: example: State of New York: NY State Retirement fund CAFR. http://cafr1.com/STATES/NEWYORK/RETIREMENT/NYRINV2001.PDF we've really got our work cut out for us to get what WE want!!"

Public Comments

1. A huge conflict of interest...
2. It would be no different than their "working years". Big Pharma owns the Government.
3. politicians shouldnt have retirement funds, they dont do anything. the job should be unpaid and those sponges should have to work a real job in addition to "serving" the public
4. "Should politicians retirement funds be invested in pharmaceuticals?" You mean it isn't? My guess is the big shots' pension investments are evenly distrbuted among pharmaceuticals, oil, military suppliers, and crooked Wall Street dealers. Oh, and fully funded without contributions from those politicians...
5. NONE OF MY CONCERN
6. I'm an Artiste I'nm above politics