Do you think the undertaker should retire?
How old is he now like 65? Do legends ever get old? I like the undertaker but I dont wanna see him get hurt cuz of his age. what do you think?
Public Comments
- yes.. it's about that time for him to GO
- I concur sadly
- YES. He should let Shawn michaels end his streak and send taker to hell
- MODERN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- fd df s d f d fd fd f d fds f ds f ds f ddsf dsf ds fds f d f d f d d d d d dsf sd fds f ds fdsf dsf ds f ds f d fd d d ds s s d fsf ds fs df sd fds fds f sd s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s sssssssssss s s s s s s ssss s s s s s s s s s s s s s
- no,but i want HBK to retire for good
- at this time he could retire. but wwe cant afford that right now he will still be a huge legend behind the scenes and in the ring. now a days he helps out talent behind the scenes more than ever and thats a great thing plus taker is in his 40's not 60's
- not yet one more title run and one wrestlemania moment
- i hate the fact the the company is not embracing his ageing. if you ask me he should lose more often (he barely ever loses) to younger talent to put them over more. for example if umaga comes back and feuds with taker then umaga should ultimately win the feud
- undertaker is 43 hes not that old , if he was 50 i would still think hes pretty young. and im only 17.
- no i want him to have more titles and keep wrestlemania streak going
- For your information,Undertaker is 43.And no,he shouldn't retire yet.He will retire in 4 to 5 years.
- wait a year or two, four at the least
- Yes he is kinda old.
- Taker's actually 43 and no he shouldn't retire. Do you know how much money Vince would lose and how bad WM would suck without The Undertaker? You probaly don't since you're ready for him to leave.
